• / Free eNewsletters & Magazine
  • / My Account
Home>Research & Insights>Fund Times>Fund Times: Global Terror's Impact on Capital Markets

Related Content

  1. Videos
  2. Articles
  1. How Fidelity Funds Stacked Up in 2013

    Fidelity's growth-leaning equity funds and more conservative bond funds made for a strong year for the fund firm, says Morningstar analyst Katie Reichart.

  2. Checking the Scorecard on Fidelity Funds

    Morningstar senior fund analyst Christopher Davis sizes up performance and stewardship at the fund family and discusses some of his favorite Fidelity funds.

  3. Fidelity Delving Into Private Companies

    In an attempt to see a longer runway for growth, some of the group's largest funds, including widely held Fidelity Contrafund, are investing in private companies.

  4. Consistency Key With 529s

    Fidelity's Andrew Dierdorf discusses how his firm's new open architecture strategies jell with Fidelity's legacy college-savings options.

Fund Times: Global Terror's Impact on Capital Markets

Plus, news on Heartland insider-trading case, new Fidelity manager, and more.

Morningstar Analysts, 09/11/2006

A study by Merrill Lynch researchers and high-yield strategists Christopher Garman and Oleg Melentyev, while limited in scope, suggests some interesting findings on market reactions to recent terrorist attacks around the globe. Markets, the research suggests, may be more resilient to these disruptions than we might think.

The researchers examined market volatility in various different asset classes for time periods of one day, one week, one month, and one quarter after 15 terrorist attacks between 1993 and August 2006. The period begins with the first attack on the World Trade Center in New York City, on Feb. 26, 1993, and ends with the London subway bombings of July 7, 2005, the last major attack prior to the study's publication. The resulting market movements often seem difficult to explain and suggest that, despite the shock that an attack can initially have on a market,  broader-based market forces of supply and demand take over for the long term.

One day after the London bombing of July 7, 2005, the S&P 500 Index gained 1.2%, one week after the event; the index was up 2.4%. Oil prices also fell by 1.8% the next day and 4.8% the next week. These results seem counterintuitive, because one might expect that an attack on one of the world's great financial centers might roil markets.

The Oct. 14, 2000, attack on the USS Cole in Yemen brought a 5.9% drop in oil the next day and a 15.7% drop one quarter later. Because one would likely expect a rise in oil prices with added instability in the region, these percentages suggest some terrorist attacks have either little impact on capital markets or at least the impact is not always obvious.

Without a doubt, Sept. 11, 2001, had the greatest impact on various markets, both in terms of disruption and overall volatility. However, even here, the direction the market initially took in response to the attack was reversed within one quarter.

While catastrophic events can jolt the global economy and roil markets temporarily, over time there is evidence of resilience in the global market economy. Therefore, when these horrific events occur, as they undoubtedly will, we suggest investors take measured responses when adjusting their portfolios and focus on more important things in life than temporary financial jolts.

Judge Dismisses Insider-Trading Claims against Heartland
While the SEC continues to allege impropriety in Heartland Advisors' handling of two bond funds it previously managed, the insider-trading charges against president Bill Nasgovitz and Heartland client Ray Krueger have been dismissed by a U.S. District Court judge.

The case involved Krueger's September 2000 sale of $25,000 in shares of the Heartland Short Duration Fund, which Krueger sold immediately after meeting Nasgovitz for lunch one day, and illustrates the difficulties involved in cases of this kind.

©2017 Morningstar Advisor. All right reserved.