• / Free eNewsletters & Magazine
  • / My Account
Home>Practice Management>Fiduciary Focus>Fiduciary Focus: Fleecing 403(b) Plan Participants (Part 3)

Related Content

  1. Videos
  2. Articles
  1. Can 401 (k )s Get the Job Done?

    Roundtable Report: Christine Benz, John Rekenthaler, and David Blanchett weigh in on how this savings vehicle can be made better and used better by the increasing number of Americans who will depend on it.

  2. How to Make the Most of Your 401 (k )

    In this special presentation, get the answers to key questions about the quality of your plan, whether your savings are on track with your goals, how to allocate assets, and what to do with assets when you leave your job.

  3. Advantages and Disadvantages of Annuities in 401 (k ) Plans

    Downside market protection, more retirement spending certainty, and longevity protection are potential benefits of annuities in retirement plans, but they're not for everyone.

  4. Experts Answer Your Retirement Questions

    Financial planner Mark Balasa and Morningstar's Christine Benz and David Blanchett tackled viewers' most pressing retirement questions, from determining savings rates and income needs to planning for Social Security and maximizing retirement accounts .

Fiduciary Focus: Fleecing 403(b) Plan Participants (Part 3)

More on surrender charges and the negative compounding effect caused by "lost" money.

W. Scott Simon, 06/07/2007

In April's column, I wrote: "Large insurance companies that offer annuities [in 403(b) plans] charge schoolteachers unconscionable fees ranging from 200 to 500 basis points in exchange for poorly performing investment products and services provided by salespeople disguised as 'financial planners.'"

Since one reader characterized that range of 200 to 500 basis points as a "gross misstatement," I set out to show in May's column that 403(b) plans not only have explicit costs but also implicit costs, which such readers seem to outright ignore as if they don't exist.

But alas, all those costs (and more) do, in fact, exist: 1) explicit costs (for variable annuities only), which can range from 250 to 335 basis points (or more if a rider for living benefits is added, for example), are composed of mortality and expense fees of 100 to 185 basis points and a mutual fund annual expense ratio of 150 basis points, and 2) implicit costs, which can range from 125 basis points to more than 1,000 basis points, are composed of brokerage commissions of 45 basis points paid on transactions, bid-ask spread costs of 40 to 1,000 basis points and market impact costs of 40 basis points. Based on this, I came up with an estimated grand total of 375 to 460 basis points (or more) which, though I didn't advance beyond 10th grade algebra, I believe is in the more expensive part of the neighborhood of that gross misstatement of 200 to 500 basis points.

"Per Head" Administrative Charges
But wait (as the infomercial goes), there's more! The "more" is an annual administrative charge of $25 or $30 borne by a teacher's 403(b) account (which ends only when an account grows typically to $30,000). This kind of charge has a particularly lethal effect on school teachers who are in the early stage of their careers and therefore are not usually deferring a lot of money. For example, suppose that a teacher defers $100 per month into its 403(b) account for five years, the account grows at 8% per year and the teacher is assessed an annual per head charge of $25:

Year 1: $25 ÷ $1,200 = 2.08%
Year 2: $25 ÷ $2,496 = 1.00% ($25 ÷ $1,200 + year 1 plus earnings)
Year 3: $25 ÷ $3,896 = 0.60% ($25 ÷ $1,200 + prior two years plus earnings)
Year 4: $25 ÷ $5,408 = 0.40% ($25 ÷ $1,200 + prior three years plus earnings)
Year 5: $25 ÷ $7,040 = 0.36% ($25 ÷ $1,200 + prior four years plus earnings)

The average annual administrative charge comes to 91 basis points (2.08% + 1.00% + 0.60% + 0.40% + 0.36%) ÷ 5 = 0.91%. That is, nearly one additional percentage point of costs--in addition to something within the range of 375 to 460 basis points--must be borne by teachers least able to afford it in the early stage of their careers. The addition of 91 basis points increases the range to 466 to 551 basis points. You can bet that the insurance companies following such a wonderful business model are thinking only one thing: "Cha-Ching!"

Surrender Charges
I mentioned, but didn't discuss, the costs of surrender charges in last month's column. These charges, more formally known as "contingent deferred sales charges," are imposed by insurance companies when a person decides to terminate an annuity. A surrender charge is normally expressed as a set of percentages of account assets that declines over time. For example, a colleague informed me last month that he had recently run across a defined benefit plan in which a doctor was sold a variable annuity by a (young) agent of a very large and well-known insurance company. The annuity featured a nine-year surrender period with declining charges of 8%, 8%, 8%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, and--Ta Da!--only" 3% in the ninth year. Oh yeah, the costs of this particular gem of a product amounted to nearly 500 basis points.

The Negative Compounding Effect on Accumulating Wealth Caused by "Lost" Money
I also mentioned in last month's column, but didn't discuss, the negative compounding effect on accumulating wealth caused by "lost money." It should be readily apparent to anyone that sundry costs, expenses, charges, commissions and fees (whether totaling 200, 300, 375, 460, 551, or more basis points) are damaging, over time, to the accumulating wealth of a 403(b) account. Few are aware, however, of the additional yet invisible damage to that wealth inflicted by the negative compounding effect of money used to pay for these costs, expenses, charges, commissions and fees.

©2017 Morningstar Advisor. All right reserved.