• / Free eNewsletters & Magazine
  • / My Account
Home>Research & Insights>Investment Insights>When Fund Names Don't Tell the Whole Story

Related Content

  1. Videos
  2. Articles
  1. Top Bond-Fund Picks for Retirees

    Morningstar's Eric Jacobson runs the gamut with some of his favorite fixed-income funds, including ideas for core, short-term, multisector, high-yield, and muni exposure.

  2. How Fidelity Funds Stacked Up in 2013

    Fidelity's growth-leaning equity funds and more conservative bond funds made for a strong year for the fund firm, says Morningstar analyst Katie Reichart.

  3. Fidelity Delving Into Private Companies

    In an attempt to see a longer runway for growth, some of the group's largest funds, including widely held Fidelity Contrafund, are investing in private companies.

  4. Checking the Scorecard on Fidelity Funds

    Morningstar senior fund analyst Christopher Davis sizes up performance and stewardship at the fund family and discusses some of his favorite Fidelity funds.

When Fund Names Don't Tell the Whole Story

Be sure to check the contents before buying.

Gregg Wolper, 03/04/2008

A few years ago, the SEC tightened the rule that requires mutual funds to invest in what their names indicate they own. In response, many funds either shuffled their holdings to better reflect their names and mandates or adopted new names and altered their mandates.

Even now, though, one can't always tell for sure what a fund invests in simply from looking at its name. Not that we think that every fund should adopt "Large Cap Core" or a similarly specific--and dull--moniker. In fact, the freedom allowed by vague names such as "Clipper Fund" has its benefits. But be aware that more-specific names still allow wiggle room, and it therefore pays to do your research.

That's especially true with international funds whose names cite a certain region or subregion. We've found a few whose portfolios might surprise an unsuspecting investor who didn't check the contents before buying. To be clear, these funds aren't breaking any rules. The point is to impress upon you the importance of checking under the hood even when a fund's name seems to tell all.

Fidelity Southeast Asia FSEAX
Given that even formal boundaries between countries can be disputed, it's no surprise that the demarcations between regions often are less than clear-cut. But by any definition, it's hard to squeeze Korea into Southeast Asia. So, investors buying Fidelity Southeast Asia might reasonably assume that the fund would focus on countries located much further down on the ol' wall map. But look: According to Fidelity's figures, at the end of 2007 this fund devoted nearly 30% of this fund's assets to Korea, more than any other market.

The explanation, says a Fidelity representative, is that the fund's prospectus defines the "Southeast Asia" mandate to include companies that are tied economically to the region, even if they aren't headquartered there. Moreover, the fund's benchmark includes a hefty Korea weighting. (The Fidelity representative says that the benchmark was selected because it was the best available choice at the time.) So, it's understandable why the manager has taken this course. That said, given the fund's name, its holdings may surprise or disappoint those investors who think they're buying a portfolio limited to markets actually located in Southeast Asia--and who aren't looking for an extra dose of Samsung Electronics.

 T. Rowe Price Africa & Middle East TRAMX
At first glance, it may seem like there's nothing unusual here: Besides a cash stake, all of the fund's money is invested in Africa and the Middle East. But look further before buying. The fund's name might intrigue investors who've heard about growth rates in certain sub-Saharan countries that defy the general public's stereotypical view of the region as unfit for serious investment. But this vehicle won't help you jump on that trend--at least for now.

In the Jan. 31, 2008, portfolio, the only sub-Saharan market represented (except for the well- established South African market, which features prominently in broad emerging-markets funds) is a 1.4% stake in Nigeria. Even South Africa gets only a 9% allocation. Other than that, the entire portfolio is in the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and other states in the Middle East.

There's nothing untoward about this allocation. After all, the Middle East is in the fund's name, and geographically speaking, Egypt (currently 19% of assets) is located in Africa. Moreover, a T. Rowe Price representative says that the fund's analysts recently visited several sub-Saharan countries to evaluate the opportunities, adding that that area will likely play a more substantial role in the portfolio in the future. The reason that it makes up so little of the portfolio now, he says, is that valuations currently are more attractive in Middle East markets and those markets are also more liquid--that is, it's easier to find enough shares to buy and sell with ease there than in Africa.

©2017 Morningstar Advisor. All right reserved.