• / Free eNewsletters & Magazine
  • / My Account
Home>Research & Insights>Investment Insights>TCW Total Return: Should You Stay or Should You Go?

Related Content

  1. Videos
  2. Articles
  1. The Picks Panel: Best Ideas From Morningstar Analysts

    Whether you need to fill a hole in your retirement portfolio or want to find a world-class company at a bargain-basement stock price, a trio of Morningstar specialists share their shopping lists of topnotch candidates.

  2. Top Picks From Morningstar's Strategists

    Morningstar investment experts Russ Kinnel, Matt Coffina, Josh Peters, and Sam Lee answer viewer questions about the current market and the best opportunities in stocks , funds, and ETFs today.

  3. 7 Habits of Successful Investors

    Special presentation: Learn how 'cheaping out,' building in discipline, and other simple steps help successful investors get it done.

  4. Bogle: Yield Seekers Shouldn't Go Out on a Limb

    Investors may need to stretch for a bit more yield, but to get entirely out of a very safe bond index fund and into riskier fare should be unacceptable, says the Vanguard founder.

TCW Total Return: Should You Stay or Should You Go?

It's rare that any manager's departure is reason to immediately flee.

Eric Jacobson, 12/16/2009

Some investor reactions to the sacking of Jeffrey Gundlach 10 days ago seemed more suited to the winter of 2008 than 2009.

It would be one thing if Gundlach had been running a public operating company--its shares would be instantly sensitive to news about the company. The shares of an open-end mutual fund such as TCW Total Return TGLMX, however, don't themselves trade in the open market and are priced solely on the values of the portfolio's underlying securities. And even if one owned shares in TCW Strategic Income TSI, a closed-end fund whose shares do trade on an exchange, it might not make sense to sell along with the departing crowd. Gundlach himself is a large shareholder in the fund and stated shortly after his departure that he didn't want to sell his shares at a steep discount after so many others had dumped theirs.

So, if you liked Gundlach's management, thought he was doing a great job, and didn't believe he was taking outlandish risks by stuffing the portfolio with illiquid securities--which he wasn't--then there was nothing about his departure that really should have been reflected in the share price of the fund's mortgage holdings or, by extension, the net asset value of TCW Total Return.

One legitimate reason to swiftly pull assets out of the fund would be a leadership or operational vacuum of some kind, a major change in investment mandate, or perhaps the installation of a subpar manager or management team. Regardless of what one thought about the wisdom of Gundlach's termination, though, none of those reasons to immediately depart were or are present when it comes to TCW Total Return. Anticipating that a number of Gundlach's colleagues might follow him out, TCW immediately replaced him with an entire management team from Metropolitan West that brought the capabilities to handle just about any investment-related task or operational job that might be the responsibility of a departing Gundlach loyalist. Met West CEO David Lippman, CIO Tad Rivelle, and representatives from TCW, meanwhile, have all emphatically declared that there are no plans to change anything about the investment mandate of TCW Total Return.PAGEBREAK

If You're the Police, Where Are Your Badges?
What about the quality of the Met West team? Perhaps it should be no surprise that the group taking over for Gundlach's team has taken some pointed arrows from various corners, given the drama of the situation. Frankly, though, few if any of the criticisms leveled thus far have any basis in knowledge, logic, or fact.

Morningstar has followed the founders of the firm since their successful days at Hotchkis and Wiley in the mid-1990s, before they even established Met West in 1996. Since then, they have built an impressive record--and one that helped the team earn Morningstar's Manager of the Year award in 2005--particularly at Metropolitan West Total Return Bond MWTRX, which is run as a broadly diversified fund and benchmarked against the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. That benchmark is dominated mostly by Treasuries, plain-vanilla government agency mortgages, and investment-grade corporate bonds. It has a dash of asset-backed and commercial mortgage-backed securities, but they constitute much smaller weightings in the index than they do in the real bond market.

Apples to Apples
That's important because many have compared Jeffrey Gundlach's record at TCW Total Return with that of Met West Total Return Bond and hastily concluded that the better trailing returns that he has earned can be simply interpreted as proof that Met West's skills are inferior. But even though Gundlach ran TCW Total Return with the express goal of outperformance against funds similar to the Met West offering (including PIMCO Total Return PTTRX, in particular), he ran his portfolio almost exclusively as a mortgage fund and didn't consider himself constrained by the Aggregate benchmark.

That doesn't mean Gundlach isn't a great manager--he most certainly and emphatically is--or that it was any easier for him to beat his benchmark or his intermediate-term bond category peers. But it does mean that for most of the past several years his fund was invested very differently--from a strategic perspective--than the Met West portfolio. Metropolitan West Total Return Bond hasn't been a benchmark-hugger, but it has alternately held large stakes in corporates, asset-backeds, and other securities that Gundlach chose to avoid as a matter of policy. In fact, there's simply no way to know whether the managers at Met West would or could have matched Gundlach's record had they run their fund more similarly to his. In part, that's because the Met West mortgage team hasn't run any dedicated mortgage portfolios, and the firm doesn't have historically comparable performance available.

©2017 Morningstar Advisor. All right reserved.