These two global blue-chip funds make good portfolio centerpieces.
World-stock funds haven't really caught with investors as core equity holdings. Overall, the world-stock category has roughly $270 billion in assets at present, whereas the three domestic large-cap groups have between $500 billion and $925 billion in assets each, and the foreign large-blend category has almost $370 billion in assets.
There are some logical explanations for the relatively limited popularity of world-stock funds. Most of them pay lots of attention to blue chips based in the U.S. and large companies headquartered overseas and thus are inappropriate for investors who already own a mainstream domestic large-cap fund or a traditional foreign large-cap fund because of portfolio-overlap issues. Global large-cap offerings tend to have significantly higher expense ratios than their U.S. and foreign rivals. And more than a few world-stock offerings are run by managers that have far more domestic expertise than international knowledge--or vice versa--and some of them employ strategies that make them too bold to serve as good core equity holdings.
But investors who are just starting out--or who don't already own a mainstream domestic large-cap fund or a traditional foreign large-cap fund--needn't worry about portfolio-overlap issues. There are more than 200 funds in the world-stock category, and a number of them are attractively priced, are in the hands of managers with global skill sets, and follow strategies well-suited to core holdings.
Meanwhile, topnotch global funds have one significant edge over their counterparts running offerings that focus specifically on either domestic or foreign equities. Their managers have the freedom to choose the companies that they consider to be the best opportunities regardless of the firms' domiciles. By contrast, the skippers of U.S. and international fund often are unable to buy certain stocks or have to settle for their second- or third-ranked options in particular sectors because of the location of the companies' headquarters.
Investors who are searching for portfolio centerpieces, therefore, should be sure to consider the better options in the world-stock category. Two that catch the eye are American Funds New Perspective
American Funds New Perspective
Dodge & Cox Global Stock
American Funds New Perspective and Dodge & Cox Global Stock have lots of merit as core equity holdings. They do come with one caveat, though. They normally park 50% to 60% of their assets to foreign stocks--and sometimes devote even more abroad--so they provide bigger international weightings than many financial advisors would recommend for investors' portfolios overall. That's something to consider. However, investors who are uncomfortable with that much foreign exposure but who like the idea of using one of these two funds as their core equity holding could readily lower the international weighting of their portfolios by choosing a domestic-oriented set of supplemental equity holdings.
Further, as national economies have become more interdependent and larger businesses have become more globalized, the line between domestic and foreign companies has become blurred. Indeed many domestic powerhouses earn hefty percentages of their revenues abroad, and many foreign blue chips produce sizable portions of their revenues here in the United States. For example, Schlumberger
Thus, it doesn't make as much sense to distinguish between U.S. companies and foreign firms as it once did. There's ample reason to consider a core equity fund that has the leeway to go wherever it finds the best opportunities.
William Samuel Rocco is a senior fund analyst at Morningstar.
Get mutual fund and stock information from our analyst team delivered to your e-mail inbox every Tuesday. Sign up for our free Investment Insights e-newsletter.