• / Free eNewsletters & Magazine
  • / My Account
Home>Research & Insights>Investment Insights>Dodge & Cox Has Faced It All and Stood Tall

Related Content

  1. Videos
  2. Articles

Dodge & Cox Has Faced It All and Stood Tall

Mistakes? This family has made a few, but it has done it its way.

Dan Culloton, 09/13/2010

Long-term investors run Dodge & Cox for long-term investors. That fact remains, even after recent executive changes and bouts of poor short-term performance.

The firm is going through another succession at the top but has a wealth of experienced people on which to draw. John Gunn, 66, who replaced the retiring Harry Hagey as chairman in 2007, will become chairman emeritus March 31, 2011. Ken Olivier, 58, who has been with the firm for more than three decades and was named CEO in March 2010, will succeed Gunn. At that time, fixed-income director and executive vice president Dana M. Emery, 48, and CIO and senior vice president Charles F. Pohl, 52, will become co-presidents.

There are more experienced people advancing up the ranks after Emery and Pohl. The median tenure of the firm's equity and fixed-income analysts and managers is more than 10 years. The median years of service to the firm among members of the organization's investment policy committees, which comprise much of the fund family's senior leaders, ranges from 17 to 25 years.

More importantly, all of the top executives began their careers as analysts or managers at the firm and are still involved in the investment process. Just as they invest with a three- to five-year time frame in mind, they take a long-term view in running their business, planning transitions several years in advance and keeping their clients' interests in mind.

Team-Oriented
A key to Dodge & Cox's success has been its ability to attract and retain qualified people who share the same investing temperament and ability to work as part of a team. The firm has one of the highest five-year manager-retention rates in the mutual fund industry, Morningstar data show. Because of its strong reputation and track record, the firm has been able to increase its staff over the years with minimal recruiting. Even in the throes of the financial crisis and bear market of 2007-09, when the firm's funds suffered outflows and lousy performance, it was able to attract and keep people. It has kept hiring one or two new graduates a year from top business schools such as Stanford, University of Chicago, and Harvard, and then has given newcomers time to imbibe the firm's approach and ethos. Investment personnel can be invited to become owners after about four or five years. Their equity, which partners buy and sell at book value (which is based on firm revenue and profits and is independently calculated and audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers), can become a big portion of their compensation and incentive to stick around.

No firm keeps everybody. As Dodge & Cox has grown, people have been able to make more money faster. Some of them might feel secure enough to break off on their own. It has happened at least once--when Kouji Yamada, a veteran analyst and manager of Dodge & Cox International Stock DODFX, left in 2007 to start his own firm. But even if Dodge & Cox's employee turnover increases in the future, it's still likely to be below average.

Dodge & Cox has learned that it will do well if its clients do well. The firm was founded near the beginning of the Great Depression. Patience is ingrained in the firm's culture. Its regulatory disclosures and shareholder communications are clear and consistent. For instance, even before Dodge & Cox Stock DODGX, Dodge & Cox Balanced DODBX, and Dodge & Cox Income DODIX slipped into slumps in 2007, the funds' managers cautioned investors against believing that the offerings' previous decade of strong absolute and relative returns could continue uninterrupted. That didn't prevent some shareholders from feeling angry and frustrated with the shop's travails, but at least the firm tried to manage expectations.PAGEBREAK

Likewise, many investors found the firm's October 2008 market commentary published in the throes of the financial-market meltdown to be cold comfort. The missive acknowledged that 2008, the worst calendar year ever for its stock funds in absolute terms, was a difficult year and that, as fellow fund shareholders, the managers felt investors' pain. But the letter lacked a mea culpa for owning stocks such as American International Group AIG, Wachovia, and Fannie Mae that the government either took over or forced into the arms of rivals at catastrophic discounts. Granted, in such an environment there was little the firm could have written to assuage everyone's angst, yet it seemed to point the finger more at the government than at itself.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Upcoming Events
Conferences
Webinars

©2014 Morningstar Advisor. All right reserved.