Appeals Court Rules Against Amgen in Patent Case -- Update
By Cara Lombardo
A U.S. federal appeals court said Thursday Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. and partner Sanofi SA can continue selling their cholesterol drug, dealing a blow to rival Amgen Inc., which had accused the companies of violating its patents.
Judge Sharon Prost of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in an opinion called for a new trial and allowed the companies' drug, Praluent, to remain on the market for now. The court in February allowed the companies to continue selling Praluent while the appeal was ongoing.
Mizuho analyst Salim Syed called the ruling a "modest negative" for Amgen. "The bottom line here is that there is no definitive winner or loser yet in this litigation," wrote Mr. Syed in a research note Thursday. While the ruling hurts Amgen by keeping Praluent on the market for at least another year, it doesn't mean the drug won't eventually be taken off the market, he wrote.
The court said the jurors received improper instructions and the district court had wrongly excluded evidence Regeneron and Sanofi wanted to use.
Regeneron and Sanofi applauded the federal court's decision and said they don't expect any new trial proceedings to start in 2017.
"We continue to believe that the law and facts support our position, and we look forward to presenting our complete evidence at trial to a new jury," said Regeneron General Counsel Joseph J. LaRosa.
Amgen said it is disappointed by the ruling but encouraged that the court in its ruling rejected the argument that limiting drug choice always hurts public interest, which could help in a future case.
"We firmly believe in the validity of our patents and we look forward to reasserting our rights in court," Amgen said.