Shire Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Rival -- WSJ
Drugmaker alleges that Allergan blocked an eye drug from Medicare contracts
By Jonathan D. Rockoff
This article is being republished as part of our daily reproduction of WSJ.com articles that also appeared in the U.S. print edition of The Wall Street Journal (October 3, 2017).
Shire PLC filed an antitrust suit against Allergan PLC, alleging Allergan's contracts with Medicare Part D drug plans for its Restasis eye drops effectively blocked access to Shire's rival drug.
The complaint, filed Monday in federal court in Newark, N.J., says Shire offered steep discounts in bids to secure insurance coverage of the company's dry-eye drug Xiidra but the Part D plans refused, due to Allergan's "bundled discounts, exclusive dealing" and other tactics.
"There was not a level playing field for us to compete" in Part D, John Neeley, Shire's head of U.S. pricing and market access, said in an interview. Some 13% of Part D patients have access to Xiidra on their drug formularies, compared with about 88% of commercially insured patients, a Shire spokeswoman says.
Allergan said there is "no merit" to the lawsuit. "In our negotiations with Medicare Part D sponsors, we are competing on value and price, and competition in the chronic dry-eye therapeutic market has driven pricing down for patients and payers in Medicare Part D and commercial plans," Allergan said.
Shire's lawsuit is the second in the past few weeks to take aim at the closely guarded contracts between drugmakers and health insurers and pharmacy-benefit managers that play an important but hidden role determining which drugs patients can get and will sell well.
In September, Pfizer Inc. filed such a suit alleging Johnson & Johnson used "exclusionary contracts" to shield its arthritis drug Remicade from Pfizer's biosimilar. J&J has said the lawsuit lacked merit and the biosimilar competition was already driving down costs.