• / Free eNewsletters & Magazine
  • / My Account
Home>Research & Insights>Fund Times>Dodge & Cox Income Back on Track

Related Content

  1. Videos
  2. Articles
  1. A 5-Year Report Card for the Morningstar Fund Analyst Rating

    We examine how our forward-looking Medalist ratings have performed since we began issuing them in 2011.

  2. 2 Gold-Rated World-Stock Funds

    Dodge & Cox Global Stock and Oakmark Global earn high marks thanks to experienced management, distinctive strategies, and fine long-term performance.

  3. Dodge & Cox on Today's Bond Market

    Dana Emery, director of fixed income at Dodge & Cox, discusses why the firm likes corporate bonds and emerging-markets debt, where rates are headed, and bond-market liquidity.

  4. Cream of the Crop: Our Favorite Funds in All Flavors

    Morningstar's Russ Kinnel, Sarah Bush, and Christine Benz highlight their top fund picks for domestic and foreign equity, core bond, inflation-protected securities, and much more.

Dodge & Cox Income Back on Track

The Gold-rated fund’s exposure to corporate bonds has gone from a headwind to a tailwind. 

Cara Esser, 11/27/2016

With a three- to five-year investment time horizon, Dodge & Cox Income’s managers have an eye for the long term. This approach leads to low turnover (typically a third of the portfolio each year) as the team is willing to be patient with its picks. A veteran and well-resourced team, time-tested process, low expenses, and an impressive long-term track record earn this fund a Morningstar Analyst Rating of Gold.


A focus on income as a component of total returns leads to a yield that's generally higher than peers' (3% as of September 2016) and to an overweighting to corporates, including an often 10%-plus allocation to junk bonds. Corporate exposure tends to be concentrated in around 50 issuers, and managers aren’t afraid to take sizable positions in downtrodden names, including Brazilian energy firm Petrobras, which the firm stuck with through its more recent troubles. Meanwhile, as the firm has built its global bond resources, this fund has added to its non-U.S. stake. As of September 2016, the fund had about 18% in non-U.S. corporate bonds, from both emerging and developed markets.

The focus on corporates and a duration that has historically run short of its Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index benchmark can leave the fund out of step with the index and peers at times. For example, during the most recent credit sell-off from June 2014 to February 2016, the fund underperformed both peers and the index. As the market turned, however, and credit rallied, it outperformed 85% of peers and the index for the year to date through October 2016. Investors can also expect the fund to hold up better than most during periods of rising rates. For example, it did better than most peers and the benchmark during the taper tantrum of 2013. Going forward, the fund’s lower allocation to Treasury bonds and shorter duration (4 years versus 5.5 for the index) should lead to better returns if rates rise, though the large allocation to corporate bonds will hurt if credit sells off. In all, over a market cycle, investors remain in good hands.

Process Pillar: Neutral | Cara Esser, CFA 11/22/2016 

The fund's management team invests with a three- to five-year time horizon, balancing the goal of outperforming the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index with minimizing the risk of loss over that stretch. They also aim to assemble a portfolio that delivers more yield than the index.

The income focus results in overweightings to agency mortgages and corporate bonds (with a 10% stake in high-yield, typically) compared with the index and peers. Corporate holdings, where much of its risk resides, are typically concentrated in around 50 issuers. The fund’s managers aren’t afraid to take unusual positions either. For example, during credit crunch from mid-2014 through early 2016, the team added to positions in beaten-down energy firms including Kinder Morgan. The firm believed that the bonds were oversold, especially given that the firm’s profitability is only partly tied to oil prices, with the bulk of its revenues coming from contracted revenue streams. The fund has since reduced its energy stake as the market bounced back in mid-2016.

An often-sizable stake in U.S. government-backed agency mortgages helps to counterbalance credit risk, and managers can use a modest amount of Treasury futures to manage duration. Overall, the fund’s long-term and deep analytical focus separates it from peers, earning it a Positive Process Pillar rating.

The fund’s duration has generally been shorter than that of the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index since mid-1998. That said, the fund doesn’t typically stray too far from home. As of September 2016, duration was 4 years versus 5.5 for the index.

The credit sell-off starting in late 2014 through early 2016 gave managers opportunities to scoop up what they viewed as fundamentally sound, beaten-down names. Then, following a rebound in credit that started in March 2016, managers trimmed credit positions, mostly in energy. The corporate stake dropped to 43% (11% junk-rated) as of September 2016, from 47% last year.

Exposure to Treasuries has changed over the years as valuations in corporates have looked either attractive or overvalued. Since 2004, Treasuries have trended downward (from about a third to 11% as of September 2016), though the allocation dropped to as low as 4% in fall 2015 when credit spreads widened and managers saw particularly good opportunities in the sector. The team then added to Treasuries as it trimmed corporates through fall 2016.

The allocation to mortgage-backed securities has remained relatively stable over the past few years (a third of assets). The fund favors 15-year mortgage bonds with high coupons issued before 2008 that are less rate-sensitive relative to recently issued bonds, which make up the bulk of the index’s exposure.

Performance Pillar: Positive | Cara Esser, CFA 11/22/2016 

Historically, the fund has held more than half of its portfolio in corporate bonds, which represented a substantial overweighting versus the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index and many peers. As a result, the fund tends to flourish when credit markets are strong but underperform in weaker credit markets. So, the fund struggled from June 2014 to February 2016 as Treasuries outperformed corporate bonds in a generally risk-off environment, trailing its average peer by nearly 100 basis points and the index by more than 200. But, as the market quickly turned, returns bounced back. For the year to date through September 2016, the fund beat 90% of peers and outpaced the index by 180 basis points.

The fund’s long-standing shorter-than-benchmark duration makes it less sensitive than its competitors to changes in interest rates. For example, the fund underperformed peers and the index during 2011’s credit crunch thanks to a short duration and its sizable credit stake, but during the so-called taper tantrum in summer 2013, the fund’s shorter duration helped relative returns as rates rose.

Over the long haul, patience and a focus on fundamentals has paid off. The fund’s trailing 10-year return of 5.3% beat 85% of peers and outpaced the index handily. It also looks strong on a risk-adjusted basis, with a better-than-average Sharpe ratio over the same period. The fund earns Positive Performance Pillar rating.

People Pillar: Positive | Cara Esser, CFA 11/22/2016 

Dodge & Cox’s fixed-income investment policy committee serves as the management team for this fund. Turnover here is low, though two members retired in 2015, bringing the committee to eight from 10 members. In all, the committee is a seasoned bunch, with each member having one to three decades of investing experience; most have spent the bulk of their careers at the firm. A large group of industry and regional analysts supports both the stock and bond managers' efforts. The team believes cooperation between the firm’s equity and fixed-income teams helps differentiate the fund because the fixed-income team can hear a more open conversation with managers about plans to declare dividends, buy back shares, or make acquisitions, all of which affect a firm’s bonds.

Cara Esser is a closed-end fund analyst at Morningstar.

©2017 Morningstar Advisor. All right reserved.